[Inaam Hussain]

Hi Stephen. I too will be sad to see the end of The Dividend Letter. Quite apart from the financial gain it has given me over the years, it’s the education and rational thinking that you have instilled that I will take with me going forward. Your principles of strategic ignorance I have applied to many aspects of my finances not just stocks. The Dividend Letter stands tall on integrity and lack of self interest, in an industry dominated by sharp salesmen and borderline criminals. I appreciated your honesty when things didn’t go to plan and your humility when things went better than expected. As Scott Mitchell has said above, and I echo the sentiment, that you have a loyal fan base who would be happy to subscribe and receive your insights via a blog, email, e-book etc, rather than lose your valuable contribution and insights to the investment education industry altogether. You are a rare breed in this industry, and it would be a shame to see it end in this fashion. On the other hand, if the time is right for you to hang up your gloves, then I fully understand and wish you all the best in whatever you decide to do next and congratulate you on a job exceedingly well done. Thank you so much

[Inaam Hussain]

Thank you for pointing out the error with the highest yielder between BHP and S32. At the time I posted, I did check both forecast yields online, but obviously must have made an error. Can I ask where is a good site to check forecast yields for occasions when it’s not in the current HYP and therefore not listed on the back pages of the most recent newsletter ? I just cross checked all the HYP8 constituent’s forecast yields with the site I normally use (https://uk.webfg.com), and noticed some significant differences.

[Inaam Hussain]

Thank you – much appreciated

[Inaam Hussain]

Sorry Stephen, just a question about the “topping up” process. If someone did the above exactly as you describe, and topped up a particular sector – when they came to top up next time around, what if that same sector turned out to be the most desirable (i.e. valued below the sector average, status is BUY, highest yield) ? Is it correct to go ahead and put further money into the same sector again ? What I mean to say is that when evaluating where to top up, does it matter if a sector previously received top up money ? I imagine not, and that the top up money goes to the most suitable, even if it’s the same as last time, but just wanted to check my understanding please. Thanks

[Inaam Hussain]

Thanks Stephen

[Author]

Posts